1. Yet, within the genealogy, we all knowthat each code you will find an exception to this rule. Good vexing area ofgenealogy would be the fact no one most knows how to apply this new exclusions orrules with people definitive adjective instance always, possibly, probably,almost certainly, an such like. It could be interesting if the around almost every other examples ofjointures getting made per year otherwise one or two immediately after a known marriage day.

2. Could there be a keen extant dispensation towards the wedding out-of ElizabethClifford and you will Sir Ralph Bowes who were third cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise fourth cousins, immediately following taken out of the newest fifth LordClifford? Who would narrow down their matrimony go out.

Arthur

Allegedly, if the a good dispensation is sought and you will supplied, it can havebeen by among the pursuing the, that will appear in the fresh new correspondingregister book, when fdating zasluge it survives:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop out-of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop off Carlisle 1509-1520

5. Should your tenth Lord Clifford does marry in early 1487 [state January] andhas Elizabeth after in that 12 months, does the chronology not really works?

John hands?

Elizabeth produced in later 1487, Henry produced into the 1488/nine, Joan during the ,etc. filling out new brands of post out-of . In the event that (a) thechronology still performs; and you will (b) her wedding part was not reduced; thenwe have only the new 1505 pedigree away from Henry VII’s that’s within the oppositionto brand new conjecture you to she is a legitimate child.

six. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Are the Clifford daughters the fresh onlyknown Henry VII affairs omitted? Have there been anyone else? Therefore,would not one to echo defectively on this file as the a source?

Out-of comparisons I’ve made from new c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith the fresh new 1480-1500 Visitation of Northern pedigrees, which happen to be

From the c.1505 Relationships pedigrees, new Clifford youngsters are perhaps not listedin a Clifford pedigree, but rather from the St. John pedigree. While the I’mnot regularly the fresh St. John family unit members, following the ‘s the guidance asit looks in the c.1505 pedigree, as obtained from the latest 1834 Coll. Most readily useful. etGen. blog post. The phrasing inside quotations is exactly whilst looks inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Regarding my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out of Somerset got three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Lady the brand new King’s Mom.” who’d “The newest Queen.” whohad “Prince “Because of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic spouse.” she got 3 daus & dos sons:

A beneficial. “Edith, wedded to help you Geoffrey Rod of Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married towards the Woman Margaret, dau. away from theDuke out of Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[an alternative youngster, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d five students:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Four daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to help you Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, wedded so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. out of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, married in order to Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and you can sistren.” With issueindicated, however called.C2. “Elizabeth, wedded so you can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Age, married basic to your Lord Zouche; shortly after for the LordScrope away from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [by Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated however named.

Margaret Duchess off Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, last spouse.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Age.”